Spinal cord injury conclusion
This study showed a strong method to show proof of concept. The results were conclusive in the fact that it showed movements such as reach and grasp can be restored in a patient with tetraplegia. The patient chosen had a high spinal cord injury that was eight years old; this proves that this method can be effective in severe cases and the results were from the use of the two systems, not residual function. The combination of the two systems is shown to be very effective and the electrodes being under the skin makes it easier to translate to clinical use.
The downside to this test is the expense and length of time it takes. The systems used require many surgeries to implant along with recovery time and lots of exercise to restore muscle strength before the actual tests begin. This experiment also is only a proof of concept; results for only one patient are shown so it is unknown if it would work for everyone.
Overall, the conclusion of this experiment is that restoration of movement can be successful using a combination of the FES and iBCIs systems. There were positive results for completing reach and grasp movements for this patient. Future experiments could explore how this translates to different patients with different types of injuries. The coding system could use modification since they claim a percentage of the failed attempts of movement were due to faults in this system. The feedback for these tests are solely visual so possible experiments could work on giving spatial and tactile feedback. This experiment is a large step in restoring movement so there are many possibilities moving forward.
Recent comments