R-selected species are those that place an emphasis on a high growth rate, and, typically exploit less-crowded ecological niches. They produce many offspring, each of which has a relatively low probability of surviving to adulthood. In unstable or unpredictable environments, R-selection predominates as the ability to reproduce quickly is crucial. Among the traits that are thought to characterize R-selection are small body size, early maturity onset, short generation time, and the ability to disperse offspring widely. R-selected species produce thousands of offspring but provide little to no parental care after birth. By contrast, K-selected species display traits associated with living at densities close to carrying capacity. Typically they are strong competitors in crowded niches that invest more heavily in fewer offspring, each of which has a relatively high probability of surviving to adulthood. Populations of K-selected organisms are very constant in number and close to the maximum that the environment can bear, unlike r-selected populations, where population size changes more rapidly. Traits that are thought to be characteristic of K-selection include large body size, long life expectancy, and the production of fewer offspring, which often require extensive parental care until they mature.
You are here
Perfect Paragraphs
Each week, post your own Perfect Paragraph and comment on three Perfect Paragraphs. Suggest improvements. Don't just say "Looks good."
Recent comments
- a vs an 7 years 10 months ago
- introductory phrases 7 years 10 months ago
- what are SNP's 7 years 10 months ago
- proves 7 years 10 months ago
- broad term 7 years 10 months ago
- "As to be able to join this 7 years 10 months ago
- Who is 'they'? Try not to use 7 years 10 months ago
- Morrill should have two r's. 7 years 10 months ago
- explain humanities 7 years 10 months ago
- explanation 7 years 10 months ago
Comments
How does the R and K
How does the R and K selection differ? You really clearly answered this main question and I think it is very well written.
Surrounding "and" in commas
Surrounding "and" in commas in the first sentence seems odd and I think it is unnecessary.