Observational differences between Figure 1 and Figure 2 are within the areas of photography, creating the map, and creating the figure. Regarding the plant images within the figures, more of the ground and parts of other plants are visible in Figure 1 than in Figure 2. More of the roof is visible in Figure 2 than in Figure 1. There is more exposure in Figure 1 than in Figure 2. There are darker shadows in Figure 2 than in Figure 1. There is a higher density of flowers in Figure 2B than in Figure 1B. Figure 2C has the colored regions out of the outlines of the native origins. Figure 1C has the colored regions within the outlines of the native origins. For the overall figures themselves, the label fonts are different. Each image location with respect to the its label are different. The images are to the right of the labels in Figure 1 while the images are both to the right and below the labels in Figure 2. The images in Figure 1 are more narrow than those in Figure 2.
Recent comments