The two figures appear to feature different trees. The large tree in figure 1 has a large gash facing the camera, while the tree in figure 2 does not. The growth pattern of the branches is also different between the two trees. It can also be observed that the background behind the trees is different in the two images.
In figure 2, long shadows can be seen in the photograph which can not be seen in figure 1. In figure 2 the sky behind the tree is blue, but the sky in figure 1 appears white. This implies that the image in figure 1 was taken on a cloudy day, and the image in figure 2 was taken on a clear day.
The two detail panels of figure 1 are very close and focused on details of a specific leaf and bark. In figure 2 however, the images are more zoomed out, showing more of the plant. It seems that the photographer of figure 1 got very close to the plant, whereas the photographer of figure 2 stayed further away.
Figure 1 was made cleanly with borders dividing each image, creating a rectangular figure. Figure 2 has all the images touching, and has edges ending at different spots, causing the figure to have an irregular shape. The labels of figure one contain more words and more detail than the labels in figure 2. From these observations, it can be inferred that the creater of figure 1 put more time and effort into creating the figure than did the creater of figure 2.
Recent comments