You are here

Image observations + Inferences

Submitted by sworkman on Fri, 02/16/2018 - 14:49

Observations –
In panels A, B and C the lighting is different between the original and replicate. The original panels from are darker in color with more saturated tones. The foliage in the original panels and the replicates appears different. The replicates show the plants with fuller foliage in a lighter shade of green. The angles are also different. In each panel the original is from a lower angle and does not include the entirety of the pot which the replicates do; these original photographs are more level with the edge of the pot. The letters on the replicate panels have a period after them, while the originals do not.
The different angles of the photographs also vary what is included on the sides of the pictures. The original panel A shows a space between the bamboo backing so the outside is visible. The replicate does not have this space, but shows the ground and the bottom of the bamboo backing; it also shows a red rectangular object behind the plant and water on the table.
The original panel B does not show any of the table; it is the plant, the top of the plant, a portion of a plant next to it and the bamboo backing. The replicate shows the same things, but additionally shows the entire pot, the table and a red rectangular object behind the table.
The original panel C shows the top of the pot up with a very small portion of the plant next to it included. The replicate shows the entire pot, the table and much more of the plant next to it and a plant on the other side.

Inferences –
The light differences could be based in different times of day/season or different equipment. The angles and format were probably not specified in the methods.

Post: