You are here

Figures on Page 5

Submitted by malberigi on Fri, 02/16/2018 - 14:27

Observations:

Part A

  • The location of tree is different in figure 2
  • The trunk width of the tree is smaller in figure 2
  • The entire tree is in the photo in figure 2, not just the branches closest to the base like in figure 1
  • The distance from the tree is larger in figure 2

Part B

  • The arrow used is smaller, thinner , and at an angle in figure 2, but are the color black in both figures
  • The leaves are shiny instead of matte in figure 2
  • The leaves the arrow is pointing to are green instead of yellow in figure 2

Part C

  • The trunk is not straight in figure 2 like it is in figure 1
  • The trunk is more close up in figure 2
  • The arrow is smaller and thinner in figure 2 and at a different angle 

Inferences:

Part A 

  • The location of the exact tree photographed in figure 1 was not included in the methods, maybe the location of another tree of the same species was included.
  • A different tree was imaged in figrue 2 and was probably not the same age as the tree imaged in figure 1
  • The photographer was standing father from the tree in figure 2, therefore there may not have been a description of how much of the tree was included in figure 1A
  • The distance in figure 2 changed maybe because the photographer was including the entire tree in the image, unlike in figure 1 where only the bottom half of the tree was included

Part B

  • There was most likely not a description of the size of the arrows included in figure 1, but there was consistant coloring 
  • The leaves look much different in figure 2, maybe this is due to the time of year the tree was imaged in figure 2 differing from that of figure 1.  This also could be an indication that these trees may look very similar, but they are not exactly the same species
  • There was either not a description of the yellow of the leaf imaged in figure 1, or there were no yellow leaves on the tree imaged in figure 2 so they had to settle with green

Part C

  • The trunks of both trees are straight (as seen in part A) but the second figure has an crooked image of the trunk.  There may not have been description about the orientation of the trunk in figure 1
  • The trunk may be more close up because the amount of the trunk included in figure 1 cwas specified in the methods, but because the trunk in figure 2 is smaller it had to be closer to the camera to fill the space
  • The arrow is also not the same width in figure 2 as it is in figure 1, it is also at a different angle in figure 2 than in figure 1 which may illustrate that there was no description of arrow orienation either

 

 

 

Post: