The differences in these figures seem to be a result of not being specific enough in the methods and not having exactly the same conditions when taking the photograph. The difference in lighting could be due to different equipment or time of day so that the lighting was different. The flower in figure 2 seems to be slightly wilted compared to how it was in figure 1 because it is less vibrant and wrinkled.
The methods section was not specific enough to get exact copies of the panels. The letter placement and format for the layout of the figures was not specified along with the exact angle of the photograph. The difference in ruler is just a difference in equipment. And the label in figure 2 panel A seems to not belong to that map, possibly from the template used.
Recent comments