Draft Post
In this lab the number of organic compounds in two unknown analgesics and three known analgesics was measured by thin layer chromatography. The two unknown analgesics were identified by comparing their elements to the elements in the known analgesics. During the first part of the lab, Aspirin, Acetaminophen, Caffeine, Unknown 1 and Unknown 2 were dotted onto a silica plate using capillaries. The silica plate was then developed in about 4 mL of ethyl acetate. In order to stop the small samples of analgesics from being washed away it was important to ensure that the ethyl acetate level stayed below the dots. It was also important to keep the silica plate vertical so that the solvent did not move up the silica plate at a diagonal. Once the solvent reached about a centimeter away from the top the plates were dried and observed under UV light and in Iodine crystals. The distance traveled by the solvent and spots was then measured and the Rfs calculated. The average Rf of Aspirin was found to be .3305, Acetaminophen to be .337, Caffeine to be .347, seemingly corresponding compounds in Unknown 1 to be .085 and .3565, and finally Unknown 2 to be .2625. After reading into research, it was discovered that caffeine should have a much lower Rf than was found. Therefore, the organic compounds that are in Unknown 1 appear to be the same organic compounds found in Caffeine and Aspirin. The organic compounds found in unknown 2 appear to be the same unknown compounds found in Acetaminophen and Aspirin. These results were found by comparing the Rfs of the known compounds to the unknown compounds.
For the second part of the lab, the effect of solvent polarity on Rfs was tested. In order to accomplish this, two identical plates were prepared with Anthracene, Benzil, and Triphenylmethanol. The difference between the two plates was their development solvent. One was developed in Ethyl acetate (the same solvent used in the first part of the experiment) and the other was developed in 95% hexane and 5% t-butyl methyl ether (a nonpolar solvent). Since Ethyl Acetate is so polar, the Rfs of all three compounds dotted onto the silicone were close to one. This means that the distance traveled by the compounds was almost as much as the distance traveled by the solvent. This is due to the tendency of the compounds being more drawn to the polar solvent than the less polar silicone plate. The Rfs of the compounds developed in hexane were much smaller meaning the compounds were more drawn to the polar silicone plate than the nonpolar solvent.
Recent comments