You are here

jkswanson's blog

Perfect paragraph

Submitted by jkswanson on Sun, 12/09/2018 - 19:32

If the apple maggot flies preference for the apple is decreased so much that it has equal preference between the two trees, then the incipient species will begin to interbreed. This is because there is now no reason for them to not mate, the previous prezygotic barrier is now abolished. They are able to mate freely resulting with a viable offspring and no natural selectiuon against them. They will no longer remain separated, they will over time either grow into one species as they continue to interbreed, or another barrier will be formed through mutation or a behavoirial change and reinforced. This allows for the separtion back into the two trees they prefer.

 

 

draft evo HW

Submitted by jkswanson on Sun, 12/09/2018 - 15:18

Part A: If the apple maggot flies preference for the apples so much that it is equal between the two trees, then the incipient species will begin to interbreed because there is now no reason for them to not mate, because the previous prezygotic barrier is now abolished.  They will no longer remain separated, they will over time either grow into one species as they continue to interbreed, or another barrier will be formed and reinforced by the apple maggots not having a preference and the hawthorne prefereing hawthorne. This allows for the separtion back into the two trees they prefer.

 

Part B: The two species will definitely diverge as they have a reproductive post-zygotic barrier that is causing hybrid offspring to be sterile.  This will not allow the two species to merge in the long run. This is because the hybrid offspring cannot reproduce leading to a very short lived new hybrid species that is merged from the two.  The two species with the mutations listed will diverge as they are unable to produce a viable merged hybrid off spring. If new mutations occur it could either reinforce this seperation or it could lead to a merging over a long period of time.

 
 

CRISPR CAS 9

Submitted by jkswanson on Thu, 12/06/2018 - 21:21

A major breakthrough may have just taken place in the genetic industry as a chinese company says that they have used CRISPR CAS 9 to take a human embryo and basically duplicate it to make two identical twins.  This is a really huge breakthrough for the ability of what CRISPR CAS 9 can do but  the question that now arises, is it ethical.  This is a ahard question to answer as human life is a natural occuring process that's has remained untouched until very recently.  These new experiments show how we are capable of so much using this CRISPR CAS 9, not soon in our future will we see technology with the ability to edit the huan embryo genome to get rid of disease, predetermine a height or a sex, or even design an entire life form to be advangtagous in everywhich way. The question still remains, is it ethical?  In my opinion it is a very much case by case thing, if a fetus is confirmed to have a disease and you have the asy option to edit the genome and basically get ird of that disease, wouldn't that be the most ethical thing to do.  It brings back the idea that life is something that should be untouched and unedited becuase that is how it has always been. Some may use that to argue diseases are needed, that it is a way of life.  I disagree, for thousands of years technology has been changing the way we do things and I think that once we are smart enough to safely do these things with CRSPR CAS 9 or other technology then I think it should be allowed.  It is just another huge technological advancement.  Humans used to give birth in the wild before civilizations were a thing and slowly over time we have developed more and more technology to make the process safer and easier. Drugs, rooms, equipment, knowlegde have all been a huge help in the safety of human birth and this is just another one of those advancements.

 

results section draft+ final draft

Submitted by jkswanson on Thu, 12/06/2018 - 21:06

RESULTS:

Day 1:








Procedure

top

bottom

Red

Yellow

No light

No light

(x dimension)

0

0

3

3

.5

3

(y dimension)

3.5

3

1

0

0

1

(z dimension)

2

6

2

2

0

1

Web presence

no

no

yes

no

yes

yes

The spiders were not moving until the ziploc container started to be moved then they would go in the opposite direction of wherever you are contacting the outside of the container

Day 2:








Procedure

Top

Bottom

Red

Yellow

No light

No light

X dimension (cm)

1

2

0

1.5

1.5

0

Y dimension (cm)

2.5

3.5

0

.5

0

1

Z dimension (cm)

3

5

1.5

2

0

2

Web presence

     

yes

yes

yes

Day 3:








Procedure

Top(yellow)

Bottom

Red

Yellow

No light

No light

X dimension (cm)

7 spider was dead

4.5

5

3

0

0

Y dimension (cm)

0

0

3.5

1

1

1

Z dimension (cm)

3

2.5

1

0

0

1

Web presence

No

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

AVG 








Procedure

Top (yellow)

Bottom (yellow)

Red

Yellow

No color

No color

AVG x dimension

2.66

2.16

2.66

2.5

0.66

1

AVG y dimension

2

2.16

1.5

0.5

0.33

1

AVG z dimension

2.66

4.5

1.5

1.33

0

1.33

Webs: distance from the LED

Top: No it is dead

Bottom: 1cm between the two sticks

Red: 0 cm starts at LED goes to edge

Yellow: 0 cm starts at LED goes to other breathe hole

No light 1: 0 cm web on and around LED

No light 2: 0 cm big web right against LED, second spider?

 

conclusion shortened draft

Submitted by jkswanson on Thu, 12/06/2018 - 21:04

The goal of this experiment was to determine whether the presence of LED light changes the behavior and web production of cellar spiders.  The data we collected supports the prediction that cellar spiders reside farther from the LED light. The data contradicts the portion of the prediction that the light decreases a spider’s web production. The data reveals that the cellar spider’s webs were found close, if not attached, to the LED light. Ultimately, cellar spiders tend to make their webs close to an LED light. There was not enough data to determine whether the color or presence of an LED light affected the production or density of their webs.

 

figure and table legend draft

Submitted by jkswanson on Thu, 12/06/2018 - 21:02

Figure 2 shows the setup of the 9 volt battery, alligator clamps, the resistor, and the LED on the outside of the ziploc chamber.

 

Figure 1 is a basic LED and 9 volt battery circuit, this is the circuit model that was followed for this experiment.

 

Table 1 is an Avg. of the distance of the spider from the LED in three days in each habitat. The web presence was also recorded and briefly described.  

 

tables and data

Submitted by jkswanson on Fri, 11/30/2018 - 14:23

Day 1:








Procedure

top

bottom

Red

Yellow

No light

No light

(x dimension)

0

0

3

3

.5

3

(y dimension)

3.5

3

1

0

0

1

(z dimension)

2

6

2

2

0

1

Web presence

no

no

yes

no

yes

yes

The spiders were not moving until the ziploc container started to be moved then they would go in the opposite direction of wherever you are contacting the outside of the container

Day 2:

 








Procedure

Top

Bottom

Red

Yellow

No light

No light

X dimension (cm)

1

2

0

1.5

3

0

Y dimension (cm)

2.5

3.5

0

.5

0

1

Z dimension (cm)

3

5

1.5

2

0

2

Web presence

     

yes

yes

yes

 

Day 3:








Procedure

Top(yellow)

Bottom

Red

Yellow

No light

No light

X dimension (cm)

7 spider was dead

4.5

5

3

0

0

Y dimension (cm)

0

0

3.5

1

1

1

Z dimension (cm)

3

2.5

1

0

0

1

Web presence

No

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

 

Webs: distance from the LED

Top: No it is dead

Bottom: 1cm between the two sticks

Red: 0 cm starts at LED goes to edge

Yellow: 0 cm starts at LED goes to other breathe hole

No light 1: 0 cm web on and around LED

No light 2: 0 cm big web right against LED, second spider?

 

significance shortened

Submitted by jkswanson on Fri, 11/30/2018 - 13:46

The findings of this study will be beneficial for multiple reasons. The data we collect will give us insight into the behavior and lives of the small cellar spiders that live in basements and homes right alongside humans. Today and going forward, LEDs are the new light bulb, they are more efficient, cheaper and easier to install and use. The LED light will began to have a much larger presence in the outdoors as street lamps, lights in the park, etc.. With LEDs becoming more and more prominent and mixed into our surroundings, this study will show some of the effects LED lights can have on spiders creating their webs, movement, sleeping, and just their overall behavior. Comparing the results of this study to studies about regular light bulbs effects on spiders can be very useful  in helping decide where to put LEDs up, how intense to have them, and the schedule for the LEDs. Many people also face fears of spiders, both rational and irrational. Cellar spiders are one of the most common species of spiders to reside in homes and buildings. Depending on the results of this study, potentially, differences in color, brightness, and/or the duration of LEDs could be used by anyone who wants keep spiders away

Lab draft part 2

Submitted by jkswanson on Fri, 11/30/2018 - 13:12

Discussion:
The starting materials were reacted using conditions specific to the reaction being performed and the
target product was obtained in a good yield. The reaction mixture began to boil fairly quickly. The
organic phase started collecting after about 20 minutes of the first reflux. The second reflux happened
more quickly. The third reflux was slow, and the final product yielded a relatively low amount of water
in the side-arm. The % yield of crude product was 65%. The % yield of the distilled product was 20%.
Assumptions about the procedure that were made can include that the compounds were all relatively
pure and did not contain impurities in the separation. The IR spectroscopy showed peaks at 4000, 2000,
and 1500 (1/cm). There was a large wide peak from 2800-1800. The peak around 4000 can be connected
to the IR absorption of water O-H, which is a strong, broad peak around 3700. There is no sharp peak
around 1740 to signal the presence of an ester. The large broad peak between 2800 and 1800 can not
be identified for any functional group. The IR spectroscopy showed that the ester separation was not
100% perfect and therefore, it can be assumed that the esterification of propyl propionate was not
100% successful.
There were multiple assumptions made for this experiment. To start, it was assumed that the right
amount of propanoic acid and 1-propanol was calculated and placed in the round-bottomed flask at the
beginning of the experiment. If this was wrong, the entire experiment would have been thrown off and
could have yielded completely different results. A second assumption that was made, was that there

was a complete separation of water during the three refluxes that occurred during the experiment
which would have indicated that the reaction went to completion. However, there was in fact very little
water collected in the side-arm and some of the water that was collected could have been poured back
into the round-bottomed flask during the cooling of one of the refluxes. This also could have affected
the separation and reaction. If the experiment were to be redone, the right amount of 1-propanol and
propanoic acid should be calculated properly and measured out more carefully. Furthermore, there
should be a more affective reflux method so that there can be a higher guarantee of the separation of
water. Also, a maximum time limit should be kept on the reflux so that the reaction does not change to
what is preferred.
Changes in the catalyst would not change the chemical parts of the reaction. A catalyst is an agent that
is introduced in a reaction to speed up the reaction and nothing else. It does not undergo any
permanent chemical change and merely affects the rate of the reaction without any outside influence.
This could however, produce more molecules of the final product in a shorter amount of time.
In general, by increasing the concentration of the reactants, the rate of the reaction should also
increase. Similarly, as the temperature increases, the rate of the reaction should also increase as well.
By decreasing the temperature, the rate of the reaction would slow down. Side products would be
formed. Furthermore, unstable reagents could result in a lower than expected yield. This is because
with unstable reagents, there is room for side reactions and other things to occur that are not wanted in
the end product. With unstable reagents, there are other components that can be formed or taken off
by heat or reaction which would end up with a lower than expected yield. Overall, the identity and
purity of the product was assessed.

Post-Lab Questions:
1.) On Pre-Lab Attached
2.) In this experiment, equimolar amount of carboxylic acid and alcohol are not used. There is more
propanoic acid used in a molar amount. Approximately 0.013 mol of propanoic acid was used and
approximately 0.011 mol of isopentyl alcohol was used. This would produce a higher percent yield of
ester.
3.) In esterification, the purpose of the sulfuric acid is that it is used as a catalyst for the experiment to
proceed more quickly.
4.) Most of the carboxylic acid was removed during the part of the experiment when the reaction
mixture was in the centrifuge tube.
5.) During distillation, pure product is collected when there is a temperature range plateau within a few
degrees of each other. For example, a first drop could be recorded at 55 °C during a distillation, but the
pure product may not be collected until the temperature plateau which could be something around 59-
61 °C.

lab

Submitted by jkswanson on Fri, 11/30/2018 - 13:11

Purpose: The purpose of this lab is to remove water from a reaction mixture to form an ester. As water
is removed, the equilibrium is upset. The ester that is being prepared in this experiment is n-propyl
propionate.
Reaction:

Experimental Procedure:
The structural C formulas were written out for the formula of alcohol and the carboxylic acid. Using
densities, the proper amounts of carboxylic acid and alcohol were determined. The proper amounts of
0.974 mL of propanoic acid and 0.823 mL of 1-propanol were determined to be used for the experiment.
The volume of the propanoic acid and 1-propanol were measured and placed into a 5 mL round-
bottomed flask. While swirling, 2 drops of sulfuric acid was added. Then, 3 boiling chips were added for
a heating. A distillation apparatus was set up which involved a distillation column, condenser, and side-
arm. The flask was heated to a gentle boil, then refluxed for 15 minutes.
The round-bottomed flask was raised from reflux to cool after 15 minutes. The apparatus was also
allowed to cool and the apparatus was then tilted allowing the water and other distillate to drain back
into the round-bottomed flask. Due to the density of the water, while the round-bottomed flask was
cooling, the distillate in the side-arm was separated in the water. Before being refluxed again, the
distillate was drained back into the round-bottomed flask, while the water stay in the side-arm. The
round-bottomed flask was lowered back into the sand bath and allowed to reflux for an additional 15
minutes.
After 15 minutes of a second reflux the same cooling and tilting process was performed as in the first
reflux. For a third time, the round-bottomed flask was lowered and allowed to reflux for a final 15
minutes. The apparatus was allowed to cool. This time however, everything in the side-arm, water and
distillate, was drained in the round-bottomed flask. This is because the reaction should have gone to

O

H
O
H+

Propyl Propionate
O

Water

O

OH
Propanoic
Acid

+

OH
1-Propanol

O
O
OHOH

Sulfuric Acid

completion, and water should not have affected the final distillate that was now contained in the round-
bottomed flask.
The ester contained in the round-bottomed flask was carefully pipetted into a centrifuge tube, and 1 mL
of water was added. The mixture in the centrifuge tube was mixed using a pipet for a few minutes. The
aqueous layer was allowed to settle and was carefully removed and placed into a beaker for later
disposal. About 1 mL of sodium bicarbonate was added into the centrifuge tube and the mixture was
mixed again for a few minutes. The reaction mixture was allowed to settle and the aqueous layer was
again carefully removed into a waste beaker for later disposal. For a last time, the extraction was
repeated with about 1 mL of sodium chloride. The reaction mixture was mixed with a pipet for a few
minutes, allowed to settle, and the aqueous layer was carefully removed into a waste beaker for later
disposal. The organic layer that remained in the centrifuge tube was carefully transferred via pipet into
a clean and dry collection vial.
Once transferred, anhydrous spheres of calcium chloride were added to the liquid and swirled. More
spheres were added until the spheres did not clump together anymore which meant that the mixture
had been dehydrated. After, the mixture was allowed to settle for a few minutes with occasional
swirling to make sure that the anhydrous calcium chloride spheres did not clump together.
Using a pipet, the liquid in the collection vial was carefully transferred into a clean and dry tared 5 mL
round-bottomed flask. A small amount of distillate was saved in case a successful distillation could not
be performed. The round-bottomed flask was attached to a distillation column and the lowered into the
sand bath and a distillation was performed. The temperature of the first drop and the collected
distillate was recorded.

 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - jkswanson's blog