The goals of this project was to be able to construct a methods section was to be able to create our own multipanel figure on our own, to be able to create a methods section to explain how the figure was created, and compare our create figure with another figure created by somebody else following our methods. By analysing the differences between the two figures created from the methods we will be able determine what parts of the methods are unclear and require more detail to create an accurate replica. The subjects that I chose for my figure were the trees covered in Ivy branches. I chose this interaction since because both were plant species there was very little chance for there to be a significant change in a two week period resulting in the same specimen not being able to be photographed for the replicate figure. Also even if there had been some sort of problem resulting in the specimen not being usable for the replicate, there were many other examples alongside the road that could also be used. When selecting my specimen, I wanted to make sure that it had a thick layer of Ivy that covered a large area of the tree to make sure it was very noticeable in the figure.
Comments
Suggestion
I don't think the introduction is the best place for the rationale behind why you chose your interspecific interaction. You could put some of this in the discussion section, explaining what you hoped would happen as a result of your choice, verses what actually happened in your recreated figure.
comment
"The goals of this project was to be able to construct a methods section was to be able to create our own multipanel figure on our own". This is only one part of your first sentence, but it is very repetitive. Instead say "the goals of this project including being able to construct a methods section, create a multipanel figure..."
suggestion
Avoid using the word 'very' because it doesn't enhance your writing.