Huskies are a breed that is most closely related to their ancestor and therefore would be the best choice for the repopulation. This is because it would allow for a similar genetic divergence overtime. After many years, the diversity of dog breeds that was available would have the potential to return to what it once was. I emphasize that this would take a very long time, but I firmly believe that Huskies would be an excellent place to start. Furthermore, Huskies are not only friendly dogs, but they also can serve a purpose. They traditionally are known as a working breed because they can pull sleds carrying goods and people in places that do not have roads. Running long distances is an easy feat for a Husky and gives them a purpose beyond being a loving companion. This demonstrates that they are a dependable and capable breed suitable for repopulation of domestic dogs.
Comments
I would restructure the
I would restructure the latter half of this paragraph in such a way that introduces the traditional use (role?) of huskies and then later state that because of this role, they serve multiple purposes.
Nice paragraph. I would try
Nice paragraph. I would try to rearrange this sentence "huskies are a breed that is most closely related to their ancestor and therefore would be the best choice for the repopulation. This is because it would allow for a similar genetic divergence overtime. " Maybe instead of saying "therefore they would be the best choice.." You could say "huskies are a breed that is most closely to their ancestors as they allow for a similar genetic divergence over time. Therefore, they would be a good choice for repopulation because..." I feel like that would make the two sentences flow better.
Clarify + Rephrase First Sentence
Clarify who the ancestors are. "Huskies are most closely related to domestic dogs' ancestor, wolf. Thus, preserving them would allow for a similar genetic divergence overtime"