To better understand how methods are written in the scientific community, a project was undertaken for my Writing in Biology course at the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the fall of 2018. A figure was built consisting of two photos of a spider-web on the UMass campus, along with a map of the location of the spider web. A methods section was written for this process, and fellow classmate followed this. A replicated image, solely based on the methods section was created, and then compared to the original figure. It was found that unless a methods section is explicit on important factors such as the number of pictures, labeling, and figure size specifications, it is difficult to replicate a figure or process. Regardless of this, small differences will be present, highlighting the importance of being explicit in every way possible when writing a methods section.
You are here
Perfect Paragraphs
Each week, post your own Perfect Paragraph and comment on three Perfect Paragraphs. Suggest improvements. Don't just say "Looks good."
Recent comments
- Looks good! I think it would 6 years 3 weeks ago
- Looks good! It might be 6 years 3 weeks ago
- Looks good! Maybe add a 6 years 3 weeks ago
- Unless this was done in a 6 years 3 weeks ago
- Rather than saying your 6 years 3 weeks ago
- Clarification regarding comments 6 years 3 weeks ago
- I think the scientific names 6 years 3 weeks ago
- I would proofread for grammar 6 years 3 weeks ago
- I think the first comma in 6 years 3 weeks ago
- Well written paragraph. My 6 years 3 weeks ago
Comments
pp response
The paragraph is well written but it is missing just a few things, mainly the big differences between the original and replicate should be listed here.
I noticed that some of your
I noticed that some of your sentences are broken up by commas that disrupt the flow of the sentence. You are better off having two shorter sentences than one run-on.