Draft 2

For root biomass, shoot biomass, and number of flowers, a two-way ANOVA was performed for each variable on all fertilizer and damage treatments. There was a significant difference in the root biomass averaged across fertilizer treatments of damage (M = 25.607800, SE = 1.893977) and control (M = 34.944375, SE = 2.296133) conditions; F_{1, 94}= 9.838, P = 0.00228 described in Figure 1. Fertilizer had no significant effect on root biomass for treatment plants (F_{1, 94}= 1.238, P = 0.26877). There was a significant difference in the shoot biomass averaged across fertilizer treatments of damage (M = 145.416000, SE = 6.448853) and control (M = 187.067292, SE = 6.619286) conditions; F_{1, 94}= 20.108, P < 0.0001 described in Figure 2. Fertilizer had no significant effect on shoot biomass between treatment and control (F_{1, 94}= 0.336, P = 0.564). No significant difference was found in the amount of flowers of treatment versus control groups averaged across fertilizer treatment (F_{1, 94}= 0.026, P = 0.8712). Fertilizer had a significant effect on the amount of flowers averaged across damage treatments plants with low (M = 66.125000, SE = 5.807913) and high fertilizer (M= 46.78571, SE = 5.62293) conditions; (F_{1, 94}= 5.450, P = 0.0217).