When comparing the two figures there were many differences that could be observed not only with the pictures themselves but with the panel layout as well. When comparing the pictures, the first thing that stands out is that both the trees look very different, with the tree in the replica having pine needles and the tree in the original not having any for of greenery at all. Another thing I noticed was that the tree in the replia didn't have the Ivy branches on the trunk like they did in the original. The pictures also had very different backgrounds, the original had a grass with a small amount of snow in the background while the replica only has snow. The tree in the original also appears to be much larger than the tree subject in the replica. The angle from which the trees shot from also appears to be much steeper than in the original compared to the replica.
When comparing the structure of the figures, one thing that stands out is the labeling of the pictures which are labeled as Picture A,B,C,D in the original and labeled 1,2,3,4 in the replica. There are also no descriptions for the figure in the replica. The size of the photos is slightly different between the two, with the original having slightly taller pictures when compared to the replica. The arrows between the two figures also shared some differences, with the arrows for the Ivy all pointed to the same picture in the replica while there is one to each picture in the original. The arrows are also slightly thicker in the replica when compared to the original. The labels the arrows pointing from are different with the original having Ivy Branches and tree and the replicate having Ivy and trees. These labels also have a slightly bigger font size than the labels used on the orginal.
Recent comments