Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner review: Pt. 4

I thought that the authors did an excellent overall job of not only proposing a controversial hypothesis, but also backing up the hypothesis with real life data and calculations. I especially liked how they combined both factual data from living organisms and educated hypothetical data to construct and support their theory. The authors also provided detailed tables with their data along with figures to help illustrate some of the points that they were alluding to. Also, because some of the data that they came up with was hypothetical or estimated I thought it was a logical idea to underestimate their calculations. The one issue that I had with the paper was that the methods section was inserted at the end of the discussion. I would have liked to know the methods before reading their statistical results.