I believe that the poster has an attractive design. I like the use of the light blue background for the text on the sides, with the figures in the middle of the poster. The poster is easy to follow, with four headings: ‘Introduction,’ ‘Design,’ ‘Results,’ and ‘Conclusions,’ clearly marked, and flowing in this order from top left to bottom right. I like how the ‘Conclusions’ section is simply one sentence, serving as the discussion. It reads “our results provide further support for the rationale of using immune checkpoint inhibition in patients with penile SCC, especially in those with high-grade tumors.” Sometimes when I read literature, I struggle to figure out exactly what is so great about the paper. This one line does an excellent job of phrasing the significance of the paper in an understandable way. It also is a great hook, because if I were to walk up to this poster at a poster session, I may skip straight to the conclusion before deciding if I want to engage the authors or spend time studying the poster. In this case, I definitely decided that this is worth my time, which is important for the authors.
Recent comments