Description
The original and replicate are different webs close to each other. This is probably because the bad weather that week destroyed the web or damaged it badly. The methods were pretty thorough on where the original web was so the only reason why it would be different would be it having to be gone. The are of the tree in the original is also a very heavily travelled area so a human could have also damaged the web. This difference in webs led to figure C also being completely different in the two panels. The web itself is more visible in the original figure A, this is because the purple folder was used to bring out the white web which is absent in the replica causing the web to barely even be visible. The angle of the picture is also different which is because nothing about this was mentioned in the methods followed. The lack of the folder and also measuring tape(edited out of the original by accident) shows that there also may have been lack of supplies on the replicators end as both of those things were listed in the methods. There were many difference in the presentation of the figures(panel shape, size, lettering,etc), this is due to the lack of thoroughness in the methods written for the original panel. The methods included things like the app used but not the shape to make the collage or the size of the map. The editing and presentation part shows how the methods section could have contained a lot more precise information
Abstract
There were many differences in the photographs taken and used and in the way in which they are presented. This is because the methods written lacked many details that were necessary to replicate the original on a very precise scale. Other factors like weather and lighting also caused differences like ruing the original web, causing an entirely different web and tree to be used.
Recent comments