Results -Labeling Differences Draft

When comparing the labeling present in either figure a total of 7 differences are noticable. The labeling has differences when it comes to font size. In Figure 2, font size when labeling the images “A – B – C” looks to be larger than in Figure 1, which has a font size of 72. The font size of the “Web location” label in Figure 1:C is 28. However in Figure 2:C this font size is notably larger; with the addition of an absence of capitals at the beginning of each word. Rather than facing upward and pointing towards Morrill 1, as is the case in Figure 1, the arrow which sits above this “Web Location” label is facing the downward direction in Figure 2:C. The line width of the arrow is not set to a width of 3.0mm as indicated in the methods either. The arrow head of this arrow is significantly wider than in Figure 1, which had used a more narrow arrow head. The arrow itself is also pointing to a different location in the two figures, with Figure 2:C having its arrow more to the left