The replicated figure does in fact show an image of the same leaf as the original. It lacks a ruler in the photo to show size. The hand holding the leaf is also not orientated the same way as the original. The time of day seems to possibly be different in the replicate since the leaf and hand is within the shadow of the tree rather than being in the sunlight such as the original is. The figure A also showed the trunk to the chute in the photo whereas the replicate only shows the petiole of the leaf in addition to the leaf itself. The figure B that shows the entire chute and the bottom half of the tree is also shadowed rather than the tree casting a 90-degree shadow to the right of its trunk. The arrow in figure B is also slightly off in regard to the angle of the arrow itself. It looks like the photo was captured while the photographer was standing closer to the tree than the photographer of the original photo. The figure C replicate also looks like it was a photo taken by someone standing closer than that of the original photo. The shadow of the trees is also different in the replicate than the original in figure C. It seems like the time of day when the photos were taken was different in the replicate than it was in the original. The tree on the left of the figure C photo is also cut off a little whereas in the original it is not cut off at all. The letters that label the figures are also a little different. They are in smaller text boxes and located more in the left corner than they are in the originals.
Recent comments