You are here

Reflection of Ecology paper 2

Submitted by nkantorovich on Wed, 11/20/2019 - 15:17

Yes, I think the title describes the subject of the paper well. The abstract summarizes the essential parts of the study and gave a brief description of the paper in a nutshell. It was also at the appropriate length. The plot sizes need to be explained more thoroughly, as this section has a large amount of given proportions without much information about the locations. There are no inaccuracies in this area. I do not think anything needs to be omitted, just a more thorough explanation of the sites. Each table and figure clearly presented important results. The tables are crammed together and need a larger space between them. This would make the tables and figures more effective. Data is not given in more than one place and units, standard errors, deviations, axis labels and legends are present. The legends are in the right format but are not on their own page. All the figures and tables seem necessary for the paper and no other figures or tables need to be added.