The organization of this poster does not follow conventional scientific sections (abstract, introduction, methods) as it is more of a review than a study. The flow of the poster is choppy and confusing. Although there are numbered sections, it stills feels clunky when following the sections in order. The beginning of the flow is in the upper middle, then it goes left and down, then up to the middle, then down, then right, then up, then down. In my opinion, this is not an optimum flow. The charts and images are simple and can be understood by reading them, requiring no additional information. As well, each section focuses on what the header prompts and properly informs the reader on the subject of that section. Overall the organization is lacking, however, the information is easily presented.
Formating was well done, but the writing requires editing. In the four paragraphs, the word count is kept minimal and paragraph form is used which prevents the poster from becoming busy. However, as I previously stated, the writing needs editing. There are grammatical errors present in all four of the paragraphs and unnecessary phrases added to sentences. This writing is not suitable for scientific purposes.
Recent comments