One factor considered in the methods was the time of day the image was taken. In the creation of Figure 1, the image was taken around 4p.m. on a Friday and there were not many people around while the photos were being taken. In Figure 2, the outside of Harvest in panel B had a lot more people inside and outside the store. If the image had been taken closer to lunch time on a weekday, this could explain the differences between the number of people in and around Harvest. In panel C of Figure 2, there was less salad stocked on the salad bar. More customers in Harvest could have removed the salad so the salad bar does not look as stocked as it did in Figure 1. The number of people could have been constantly moving the tongs explaining the different orientations of the tongs in Figure 2. Since Figure 2’s photos were taken when there were more customers, they could have forced the different camera locations as they were in the way of the photos being taken from the point of view described in the methods. Time was a factor controlled in the methods that may not have been followed in the recreation of Figure 1.
Comments
Font choice
Modern fonts typically do not have feet on the letters (like times new roman and gothic fonts) but instead have rounded edges for a more technology/modern based look (i.e. arial or calibria, or the font printed on any keyboard you see) and this font really detracts from the work and distracts the reader.
reply
it is indeed a differe font choice and not used in your typical scientific pape. also make sure there is more flow as it is a little choppy connect a to b, instead of simply presenting idea a , b , c
the "P" in panel shoule be
the "P" in panel shoule be capitalized when referring to a specific panel, just like the "F" in figure when refuring to a specific figure