discussion

The biggest difference in the two seems to be the formatting of the figure. The major difference of the figure being the map. the first difference is two big borders on the map, which I didn't have. the second thing about the formatting is that the replica had an arrow that was pointing up rather than down. the arrow was longer in the original figure compared to the replica, and the arrow was more narrow. The third difference is the size of the label. It appears that the original label is quite a bit larger than the replica. 

Another difference is the image itself. The two leaves are significantly different whereas the leaf in the original is more rounded, the leaf in the replica is more oval-shaped and has a lighter color compared to the darker colored leaf in the original. The hand was also different. the third thing that was different is that the original had a background that had a slight slash across the back that the replica did not have. 

The least noticeable category of difference in image quality. The image quality on the original is clearly better than that of the original, and because of this, the original is noticeably blurrier than that of the replica. In addition, the original has a more warmed toned hue compared to that of the replica.